Google Slammed For Giving Gmail Access To Third Party Developers (Humans)

There are many third-party apps that require access to your Gmail account. For instance, the ones that help you plan trips or shop online. The situation seems to be fine until one realizes other humans are also reading their emails.

According to a report from WSJ, third-party apps have access to users’ Gmail accounts and permission to read people’s emails but only after the consent of the users which nowadays isn’t important anymore.

The publication has named two apps among the list of many. Return Path – an app that collects data for marketers – read around 8,000 emails a couple of years ago. Another is Edison Software that is known to have allowed its employees to read thousands of emails to train their smart reply feature.

They defended themselves by saying their policies reflect their actions which are now a thing of the past and user consent was obtained before using the data. When accessing user data, the employees must stick to the rules.

Typically, a popup box is thrown in front of the users asking them for permissions to access different kinds of data and device components. However, it doesn’t explicitly mentions that humans would also be given to access it.

Google says it thoroughly checks third-party developers before giving them access to user data. This includes verifying that an app correctly identifies its developers and its privacy policies are clear and easily accessible.

Giving apps access to users inbox may not come as a surprise at all. In fact, it’s a “common practice” implemented by other email providers. But even the thought of humans reading emails sends a chill down the spine when combined with the fact that Gmail is the biggest of all.

The timing of this news makes it more unpleasant. Facebook is facing the consequences of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The company allowed third-party developer access and ended up giving the information of 87 million users. In the case of Google, fortunately, no misuse of data has been reported until now.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:

Check your Gmail Account Email is Secured or Not After 50 Lacs Gmail account Hacking

Comments

Chrome Web Browser Will Now Use 10% More RAM With Spectre Fix

A new security feature named ‘Site Isolation’ has been introduced for Google Chrome 67 which would nullify the effects of speculative execution side-channel attacks like Spectre. To put things to the perspective, Spectre is one of the two fundamental design flaws in the modern processors, which allow programs to get access to the data for which it is not authorized. Malicious data can exploit this flaw to steal your password and other personal information. What is Site Isolation? The new Site Isolation feature introduced in Google Chrome 67 brings about a fundamental change to Chrome’s architecture. Now, Chrome has changed how its multi-process architecture worked and different tabs used different render processes. According to the new architecture, Chrome limits each renderer process to a single site. By this separation of processes, Google aims to prevent direct memory reading across different processes to safeguard users’ data. According to G...

Google starts rolling out ‘Call Screen’ feature for Pixel smartphones

San Francisco, Dec 2 (IANS) Google has started rolling out a feature for its Pixel smartphones that lets users make use of the Google Assistant to see who is calling and why before they answer a call. The feature allows users to see a real-time transcript of how the caller responds so that they can then decide whether to pick up, respond by tapping a quick reply (for example, “I’ll call you back later”), or mark the call as spam and dismiss. “Call Screen is only available to English speakers in the United States who have Pixel 2, 2 XL, 3, or 3XL devices. If you don’t see Call Screen in the Phone app’s settings, it’s not available yet,” Google said. Call Screen, which can help users save the time spent on picking up unimportant calls from unknown numbers, does not use Wi-Fi or mobile data of the user. This feature does not work with third-party call recording and screen recording apps as these apps may interfere with how the feature works. It is better to turn off these app...

Amazon, Reddit And Others Fail To Warn Us About Dumb Passwords

B elieve it or not, there is still a large number of people who use passwords such as “password,” “password123”, “[dog’s name]1” and others along the same lines. And in the era of sophisticated hacking, these passwords are not exactly “safe.” Before me, this is the first thing websites should inform you while setting up a password. But apparently, many big names are not doing enough to encourage non-terrible passwords, according to the new research . Steve Furnell from the University of Plymouth has been keeping tabs on the websites like Amazon, Reddit, and Wikipedia for many years, carrying out similar assessments in 2007, 2011 and 2014. His 2018 survey examined practices of Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Reddit, Yahoo, Amazon, Twitter, Instagram, Microsoft Live, and Netflix. The study concluded that Amazon had the worst performance among all the names. It nearly accepted every kind of password of any length. On the other hand, Yahoo and Wikip...

Tech Knock

Search This Blog